Mitsubishi ASX vs Renault Captur E-Tech: real-world fuel use
In real life the Renault Captur E-Tech uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel than the Mitsubishi ASX — about £139 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
721 cars in the data
Mitsubishi ASX3.9×the official figure
Official
1.3
Real world
5.0
0510 L/100 km
30,866 cars in the data
Renault Captur E-Tech3.2×the official figure
Official
1.4
Real world
4.4
0510 L/100 km
| Mitsubishi ASX | Renault Captur E-Tech | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 5.0 | 4.4 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| Gap vs official | 3.9× | 3.2× |
| Distance with engine off | 25% | — |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 117 | 101 |
| Official electric range (km) | 48 | 50 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,631 | 1,623 |
| Cars in the data | 721 | 30,866 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Renault Captur E-Tech comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Run the calculator with your own driving.