Kia Ceed vs Renault Captur E-Tech: real-world fuel use
In real life the Kia Ceed uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel than the Renault Captur E-Tech — about £71 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
6,048 cars in the data
Kia Ceed3.1×the official figure
Official
1.3
Real world
4.0
0510 L/100 km
30,866 cars in the data
Renault Captur E-Tech3.2×the official figure
Official
1.4
Real world
4.4
0510 L/100 km
| Kia Ceed | Renault Captur E-Tech | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 4.0 | 4.4 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| Gap vs official | 3.1× | 3.2× |
| Distance with engine off | 22% | — |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 93 | 101 |
| Official electric range (km) | 49 | 50 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,610 | 1,623 |
| Cars in the data | 6,048 | 30,866 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Kia Ceed comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Run the calculator with your own driving.