Mitsubishi ASX vs Renault Megane E-Tech: real-world fuel use
In real life the Mitsubishi ASX uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel than the Renault Megane E-Tech — about £42 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
721 cars in the data
Mitsubishi ASX3.9×the official figure
Official
1.3
Real world
5.0
0510 L/100 km
10,719 cars in the data
Renault Megane E-Tech4.2×the official figure
Official
1.3
Real world
5.2
0510 L/100 km
| Mitsubishi ASX | Renault Megane E-Tech | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Gap vs official | 3.9× | 4.2× |
| Distance with engine off | 25% | — |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 117 | 121 |
| Official electric range (km) | 48 | 51 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,631 | 1,659 |
| Cars in the data | 721 | 10,719 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Mitsubishi ASX comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Run the calculator with your own driving.