Mitsubishi ASX vs SEAT Leon Sportstourer e-Hybrid: real-world fuel use
In real life the SEAT Leon Sportstourer e-Hybrid uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel than the Mitsubishi ASX — about £73 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
721 cars in the data
Mitsubishi ASX3.9×the official figure
Official
1.3
Real world
5.0
0510 L/100 km
2,559 cars in the data
SEAT Leon Sportstourer e-Hybrid4.0×the official figure
Official
1.2
Real world
4.7
0510 L/100 km
| Mitsubishi ASX | SEAT Leon Sportstourer e-Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 5.0 | 4.7 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| Gap vs official | 3.9× | 4.0× |
| Distance with engine off | 25% | 30% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 117 | 108 |
| Official electric range (km) | 48 | 66 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,631 | 1,659 |
| Cars in the data | 721 | 2,559 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the SEAT Leon Sportstourer e-Hybrid comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Mitsubishi ASX 25% of the time with the engine off, and the SEAT Leon Sportstourer e-Hybrid 30%. Run the calculator with your own driving.