Renault Captur E-Tech vs Škoda Octavia: real-world fuel use
In real life the Renault Captur E-Tech uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel than the Škoda Octavia — about £111 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
30,866 cars in the data
Renault Captur E-Tech3.2×the official figure
Official
1.4
Real world
4.4
0510 L/100 km
1,415 cars in the data
Škoda Octavia4.7×the official figure
Official
1.0
Real world
4.9
0510 L/100 km
| Renault Captur E-Tech | Škoda Octavia | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 4.4 | 4.9 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Gap vs official | 3.2× | 4.7× |
| Distance with engine off | — | 23% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 101 | 113 |
| Official electric range (km) | 50 | 70 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,623 | 1,622 |
| Cars in the data | 30,866 | 1,415 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Renault Captur E-Tech comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Run the calculator with your own driving.