BMW X2 xDrive25e vs Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 e: real-world fuel use
In real life the Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 e uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel than the BMW X2 xDrive25e — about £237 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
4,701 cars in the data
BMW X2 xDrive25e3.6×the official figure
Official
1.7
Real world
6.1
0510 L/100 km
38,368 cars in the data
Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 e3.9×the official figure
Official
1.3
Real world
5.0
0510 L/100 km
| BMW X2 xDrive25e | Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 e | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 6.1 | 5.0 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| Gap vs official | 3.6× | 3.9× |
| Distance with engine off | 27% | 33% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 142 | 116 |
| Official electric range (km) | 52 | 64 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,805 | 1,784 |
| Cars in the data | 4,701 | 38,368 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 e comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the BMW X2 xDrive25e 27% of the time with the engine off, and the Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 e 33%. Run the calculator with your own driving.