BMW X2 xDrive25e vs Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4: real-world fuel use
In real life the Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4 uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel than the BMW X2 xDrive25e — about £82 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
4,701 cars in the data
BMW X2 xDrive25e3.6×the official figure
Official
1.7
Real world
6.1
0510 L/100 km
9,637 cars in the data
Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL43.2×the official figure
Official
1.8
Real world
5.7
0510 L/100 km
| BMW X2 xDrive25e | Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 6.1 | 5.7 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.7 | 1.8 |
| Gap vs official | 3.6× | 3.2× |
| Distance with engine off | 27% | 42% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 142 | 133 |
| Official electric range (km) | 52 | 50 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,805 | 1,790 |
| Cars in the data | 4,701 | 9,637 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4 comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the BMW X2 xDrive25e 27% of the time with the engine off, and the Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4 42%. Run the calculator with your own driving.