Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 e vs Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4: real-world fuel use
In real life the Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 e uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel than the Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4 — about £155 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
38,368 cars in the data
Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 e3.9×the official figure
Official
1.3
Real world
5.0
0510 L/100 km
9,637 cars in the data
Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL43.2×the official figure
Official
1.8
Real world
5.7
0510 L/100 km
| Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 e | Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 5.0 | 5.7 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.3 | 1.8 |
| Gap vs official | 3.9× | 3.2× |
| Distance with engine off | 33% | 42% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 116 | 133 |
| Official electric range (km) | 64 | 50 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,784 | 1,790 |
| Cars in the data | 38,368 | 9,637 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 e comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 e 33% of the time with the engine off, and the Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4 42%. Run the calculator with your own driving.
More comparisons
Audi Q3 e-tron vs Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4Audi Q3 Sportback e-tron vs Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4BMW 225xe iPerformance vs Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 eBMW 225xe iPerformance vs Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4BMW X2 xDrive25e vs Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 eBMW X2 xDrive25e vs Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4