BMW X2 xDrive25e vs Volvo XC40: real-world fuel use
In real life both use about the same fuel: 6.1 L/100 km.
4,701 cars in the data
BMW X2 xDrive25e3.6×the official figure
Official
1.7
Real world
6.1
0510 L/100 km
64,962 cars in the data
Volvo XC402.9×the official figure
Official
2.1
Real world
6.2
0510 L/100 km
| BMW X2 xDrive25e | Volvo XC40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 6.1 | 6.2 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.7 | 2.1 |
| Gap vs official | 3.6× | 2.9× |
| Distance with engine off | 27% | 22% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 142 | 142 |
| Official electric range (km) | 52 | 46 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,805 | 1,812 |
| Cars in the data | 4,701 | 64,962 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the BMW X2 xDrive25e comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the BMW X2 xDrive25e 27% of the time with the engine off, and the Volvo XC40 22%. Run the calculator with your own driving.