Škoda Superb vs Toyota C-HR: real-world fuel use
In real life the Toyota C-HR uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel than the Škoda Superb — about £414 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
1,064 cars in the data
Škoda Superb4.5×the official figure
Official
1.3
Real world
5.6
0510 L/100 km
256 cars in the data
Toyota C-HR4.4×the official figure
Official
0.8
Real world
3.7
0510 L/100 km
| Škoda Superb | Toyota C-HR | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 5.6 | 3.7 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| Gap vs official | 4.5× | 4.4× |
| Distance with engine off | 35% | 37% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 130 | 85 |
| Official electric range (km) | 62 | 66 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,756 | 1,727 |
| Cars in the data | 1,064 | 256 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Toyota C-HR comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Škoda Superb 35% of the time with the engine off, and the Toyota C-HR 37%. Run the calculator with your own driving.