Opel Astra Sports Tourer vs Toyota C-HR: real-world fuel use
In real life the Toyota C-HR uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel than the Opel Astra Sports Tourer — about £386 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
442 cars in the data
Opel Astra Sports Tourer5.0×the official figure
Official
1.1
Real world
5.5
0510 L/100 km
256 cars in the data
Toyota C-HR4.4×the official figure
Official
0.8
Real world
3.7
0510 L/100 km
| Opel Astra Sports Tourer | Toyota C-HR | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 5.5 | 3.7 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| Gap vs official | 5.0× | 4.4× |
| Distance with engine off | 26% | 37% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 127 | 85 |
| Official electric range (km) | 64 | 66 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,719 | 1,727 |
| Cars in the data | 442 | 256 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Toyota C-HR comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Opel Astra Sports Tourer 26% of the time with the engine off, and the Toyota C-HR 37%. Run the calculator with your own driving.