Škoda Superb vs Volkswagen Passat: real-world fuel use
In real life both use about the same fuel: 5.6 L/100 km.
1,064 cars in the data
Škoda Superb4.5×the official figure
Official
1.3
Real world
5.6
0510 L/100 km
4,716 cars in the data
Volkswagen Passat5.2×the official figure
Official
1.1
Real world
5.7
0510 L/100 km
| Škoda Superb | Volkswagen Passat | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 5.6 | 5.7 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| Gap vs official | 4.5× | 5.2× |
| Distance with engine off | 35% | 28% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 130 | 131 |
| Official electric range (km) | 62 | 70 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,756 | 1,766 |
| Cars in the data | 1,064 | 4,716 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Škoda Superb comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Škoda Superb 35% of the time with the engine off, and the Volkswagen Passat 28%. Run the calculator with your own driving.