Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S e Performance vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid: real-world fuel use
In real life the Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel than the Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S e Performance — about £437 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
837 cars in the data
Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S e Performance2.0×the official figure
Official
6.8
Real world
13.8
0715 L/100 km
425 cars in the data
Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid4.3×the official figure
Official
2.7
Real world
11.7
0715 L/100 km
| Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S e Performance | Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 13.8 | 11.7 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 6.8 | 2.7 |
| Gap vs official | 2.0× | 4.3× |
| Distance with engine off | 10% | 21% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 319 | 271 |
| Official electric range (km) | 13 | 53 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,177 | 2,439 |
| Cars in the data | 837 | 425 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S e Performance 10% of the time with the engine off, and the Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid 21%. Run the calculator with your own driving.
More comparisons
BMW M5 vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-HybridBMW XM 50e vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-HybridBMW XM Label vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-HybridBMW XM vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-HybridFerrari SF90 Spider vs Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S e PerformanceMercedes-Benz AMG GLC 63S e Performance vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid