Ferrari SF90 Spider vs Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S e Performance: real-world fuel use
In real life the Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S e Performance uses 5.1 L/100 km less fuel than the Ferrari SF90 Spider — about £1,067 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
264 cars in the data
Ferrari SF90 Spider2.9×the official figure
Official
6.6
Real world
18.9
0715 L/100 km
837 cars in the data
Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S e Performance2.0×the official figure
Official
6.8
Real world
13.8
0715 L/100 km
| Ferrari SF90 Spider | Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S e Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 18.9 | 13.8 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Gap vs official | 2.9× | 2.0× |
| Distance with engine off | — | 10% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 437 | 319 |
| Official electric range (km) | 22 | 13 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,919 | 2,177 |
| Cars in the data | 264 | 837 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S e Performance comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Run the calculator with your own driving.