BMW XM Label vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid: real-world fuel use
In real life the Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel than the BMW XM Label — about £105 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
585 cars in the data
BMW XM Label6.5×the official figure
Official
1.9
Real world
12.2
0715 L/100 km
425 cars in the data
Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid4.3×the official figure
Official
2.7
Real world
11.7
0715 L/100 km
| BMW XM Label | Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 12.2 | 11.7 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.9 | 2.7 |
| Gap vs official | 6.5× | 4.3× |
| Distance with engine off | 31% | 21% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 283 | 271 |
| Official electric range (km) | 78 | 53 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,795 | 2,439 |
| Cars in the data | 585 | 425 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the BMW XM Label 31% of the time with the engine off, and the Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid 21%. Run the calculator with your own driving.
More comparisons
BMW M5 vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-HybridBMW XM 50e vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-HybridBMW XM Label vs Mercedes-Benz AMG S 63 e PerformanceBMW XM Label vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-HybridBMW XM vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-HybridMercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S e Performance vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid