Jaguar E-Pace vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: real-world fuel use
In real life the Jaguar E-Pace uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque — about £84 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
1,448 cars in the data
Jaguar E-Pace4.5×the official figure
Official
1.5
Real world
7.0
0510 L/100 km
5,376 cars in the data
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque4.6×the official figure
Official
1.6
Real world
7.4
0510 L/100 km
| Jaguar E-Pace | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 7.0 | 7.4 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Gap vs official | 4.5× | 4.6× |
| Distance with engine off | 23% | 22% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 161 | 170 |
| Official electric range (km) | 70 | 81 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,202 | 2,192 |
| Cars in the data | 1,448 | 5,376 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Jaguar E-Pace comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Jaguar E-Pace 23% of the time with the engine off, and the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 22%. Run the calculator with your own driving.