Jaguar E-Pace vs Mercedes-Benz GLC 300 e 4MATIC: real-world fuel use
In real life the Mercedes-Benz GLC 300 e 4MATIC uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel than the Jaguar E-Pace — about £38 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
1,448 cars in the data
Jaguar E-Pace4.5×the official figure
Official
1.5
Real world
7.0
0510 L/100 km
38,899 cars in the data
Mercedes-Benz GLC 300 e 4MATIC5.3×the official figure
Official
1.3
Real world
6.8
0510 L/100 km
| Jaguar E-Pace | Mercedes-Benz GLC 300 e 4MATIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 7.0 | 6.8 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.5 | 1.3 |
| Gap vs official | 4.5× | 5.3× |
| Distance with engine off | 23% | 29% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 161 | 157 |
| Official electric range (km) | 70 | 91 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,202 | 2,212 |
| Cars in the data | 1,448 | 38,899 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Mercedes-Benz GLC 300 e 4MATIC comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Jaguar E-Pace 23% of the time with the engine off, and the Mercedes-Benz GLC 300 e 4MATIC 29%. Run the calculator with your own driving.