Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Lexus RX 450h+: real-world fuel use
In real life the Lexus RX 450h+ uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque — about £376 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
5,376 cars in the data
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque4.6×the official figure
Official
1.6
Real world
7.4
0510 L/100 km
708 cars in the data
Lexus RX 450h+5.2×the official figure
Official
1.1
Real world
5.6
0510 L/100 km
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Lexus RX 450h+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 7.4 | 5.6 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| Gap vs official | 4.6× | 5.2× |
| Distance with engine off | 22% | 28% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 170 | 129 |
| Official electric range (km) | 81 | 68 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,192 | 2,185 |
| Cars in the data | 5,376 | 708 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Lexus RX 450h+ comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 22% of the time with the engine off, and the Lexus RX 450h+ 28%. Run the calculator with your own driving.