BMW XM Label vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid: real-world fuel use
In real life the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel than the BMW XM Label — about £19 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
585 cars in the data
BMW XM Label6.5×the official figure
Official
1.9
Real world
12.2
0715 L/100 km
890 cars in the data
Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid3.2×the official figure
Official
3.8
Real world
12.2
0715 L/100 km
| BMW XM Label | Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.9 | 3.8 |
| Gap vs official | 6.5× | 3.2× |
| Distance with engine off | 31% | 18% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 283 | 281 |
| Official electric range (km) | 78 | 43 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,795 | 2,592 |
| Cars in the data | 585 | 890 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the BMW XM Label 31% of the time with the engine off, and the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid 18%. Run the calculator with your own driving.
More comparisons
BMW M5 vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-HybridBMW XM 50e vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-HybridBMW XM Label vs Mercedes-Benz AMG S 63 e PerformanceBMW XM Label vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-HybridBMW XM vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-HybridMercedes-Benz AMG GLC 63S e Performance vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid