Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4 vs Volvo XC40: real-world fuel use
In real life the Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4 uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel than the Volvo XC40 — about £86 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
9,637 cars in the data
Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL43.2×the official figure
Official
1.8
Real world
5.7
0510 L/100 km
64,962 cars in the data
Volvo XC402.9×the official figure
Official
2.1
Real world
6.2
0510 L/100 km
| Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4 | Volvo XC40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 5.7 | 6.2 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| Gap vs official | 3.2× | 2.9× |
| Distance with engine off | 42% | 22% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 133 | 142 |
| Official electric range (km) | 50 | 46 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,790 | 1,812 |
| Cars in the data | 9,637 | 64,962 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4 comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Mini Countryman Cooper SE ALL4 42% of the time with the engine off, and the Volvo XC40 22%. Run the calculator with your own driving.