Mercedes-Benz AMG e 53 vs Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid: real-world fuel use
In real life the Mercedes-Benz AMG e 53 uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel than the Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid — about £181 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
372 cars in the data
Mercedes-Benz AMG e 539.8×the official figure
Official
1.0
Real world
9.5
0715 L/100 km
11,085 cars in the data
Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid3.2×the official figure
Official
3.2
Real world
10.4
0715 L/100 km
| Mercedes-Benz AMG e 53 | Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 9.5 | 10.4 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.0 | 3.2 |
| Gap vs official | 9.8× | 3.2× |
| Distance with engine off | 25% | 21% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 220 | 240 |
| Official electric range (km) | 93 | 46 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,416 | 2,413 |
| Cars in the data | 372 | 11,085 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Mercedes-Benz AMG e 53 comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Mercedes-Benz AMG e 53 25% of the time with the engine off, and the Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid 21%. Run the calculator with your own driving.