BMW 750e xDrive vs Mercedes-Benz AMG e 53: real-world fuel use
In real life the BMW 750e xDrive uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel than the Mercedes-Benz AMG e 53 — about £315 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
970 cars in the data
BMW 750e xDrive7.4×the official figure
Official
1.1
Real world
8.0
0715 L/100 km
372 cars in the data
Mercedes-Benz AMG e 539.8×the official figure
Official
1.0
Real world
9.5
0715 L/100 km
| BMW 750e xDrive | Mercedes-Benz AMG e 53 | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 8.0 | 9.5 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| Gap vs official | 7.4× | 9.8× |
| Distance with engine off | 23% | 25% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 186 | 220 |
| Official electric range (km) | 79 | 93 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,455 | 2,416 |
| Cars in the data | 970 | 372 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the BMW 750e xDrive comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the BMW 750e xDrive 23% of the time with the engine off, and the Mercedes-Benz AMG e 53 25%. Run the calculator with your own driving.