Mazda MX-30 vs MG EHS: real-world fuel use
In real life the Mazda MX-30 uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel than the MG EHS — about £355 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
1,004 cars in the data
Mazda MX-306.1×the official figure
Official
0.9
Real world
5.5
0510 L/100 km
7,270 cars in the data
MG EHS3.9×the official figure
Official
1.8
Real world
7.2
0510 L/100 km
| Mazda MX-30 | MG EHS | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 5.5 | 7.2 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 0.9 | 1.8 |
| Gap vs official | 6.1× | 3.9× |
| Distance with engine off | 14% | 15% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 127 | 166 |
| Official electric range (km) | 86 | 52 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,853 | 1,846 |
| Cars in the data | 1,004 | 7,270 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Mazda MX-30 comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Mazda MX-30 14% of the time with the engine off, and the MG EHS 15%. Run the calculator with your own driving.