Jeep Renegade vs Mazda MX-30: real-world fuel use
In real life the Mazda MX-30 uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel than the Jeep Renegade — about £151 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
9,252 cars in the data
Jeep Renegade3.3×the official figure
Official
1.9
Real world
6.2
0510 L/100 km
1,004 cars in the data
Mazda MX-306.1×the official figure
Official
0.9
Real world
5.5
0510 L/100 km
| Jeep Renegade | Mazda MX-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 6.2 | 5.5 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.9 | 0.9 |
| Gap vs official | 3.3× | 6.1× |
| Distance with engine off | 28% | 14% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 144 | 127 |
| Official electric range (km) | 47 | 86 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,845 | 1,853 |
| Cars in the data | 9,252 | 1,004 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Mazda MX-30 comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Jeep Renegade 28% of the time with the engine off, and the Mazda MX-30 14%. Run the calculator with your own driving.