Land Rover Range Rover Velar vs Volvo XC90: real-world fuel use
In real life the Volvo XC90 uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar — about £130 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
1,102 cars in the data
Land Rover Range Rover Velar3.9×the official figure
Official
2.2
Real world
8.5
0510 L/100 km
44,557 cars in the data
Volvo XC904.7×the official figure
Official
1.7
Real world
7.9
0510 L/100 km
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar | Volvo XC90 | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 2.2 | 1.7 |
| Gap vs official | 3.9× | 4.7× |
| Distance with engine off | 16% | 23% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 197 | 183 |
| Official electric range (km) | 119 | 63 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,280 | 2,304 |
| Cars in the data | 1,102 | 44,557 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Volvo XC90 comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Land Rover Range Rover Velar 16% of the time with the engine off, and the Volvo XC90 23%. Run the calculator with your own driving.