Land Rover Range Rover Velar vs Mercedes-Benz E 400 e 4MATIC: real-world fuel use
In real life the Mercedes-Benz E 400 e 4MATIC uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar — about £468 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
1,102 cars in the data
Land Rover Range Rover Velar3.9×the official figure
Official
2.2
Real world
8.5
0510 L/100 km
641 cars in the data
Mercedes-Benz E 400 e 4MATIC9.3×the official figure
Official
0.7
Real world
6.3
0510 L/100 km
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar | Mercedes-Benz E 400 e 4MATIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 8.5 | 6.3 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 2.2 | 0.7 |
| Gap vs official | 3.9× | 9.3× |
| Distance with engine off | 16% | 32% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 197 | 145 |
| Official electric range (km) | 119 | 106 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,280 | 2,262 |
| Cars in the data | 1,102 | 641 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Mercedes-Benz E 400 e 4MATIC comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Land Rover Range Rover Velar 16% of the time with the engine off, and the Mercedes-Benz E 400 e 4MATIC 32%. Run the calculator with your own driving.
More comparisons
BMW 550e xDrive vs Mercedes-Benz E 400 e 4MATICLand Rover Discovery Sport vs Mercedes-Benz E 400 e 4MATICLand Rover Range Rover Velar vs Mercedes-Benz E 300 de 4MATICLand Rover Range Rover Velar vs Mercedes-Benz GLC 400 e 4MATICLand Rover Range Rover Velar vs Volvo XC90Mercedes-Benz E 400 e 4MATIC vs Volvo XC90