Cupra Formentor VZ E-Hybrid vs DS DS 4: real-world fuel use
In real life the DS DS 4 uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel than the Cupra Formentor VZ E-Hybrid — about £107 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
11,084 cars in the data
Cupra Formentor VZ E-Hybrid3.9×the official figure
Official
1.4
Real world
5.6
0510 L/100 km
1,431 cars in the data
DS DS 44.0×the official figure
Official
1.3
Real world
5.0
0510 L/100 km
| Cupra Formentor VZ E-Hybrid | DS DS 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 5.6 | 5.0 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| Gap vs official | 3.9× | 4.0× |
| Distance with engine off | 28% | 34% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 128 | 117 |
| Official electric range (km) | 56 | 61 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,701 | 1,728 |
| Cars in the data | 11,084 | 1,431 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the DS DS 4 comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Cupra Formentor VZ E-Hybrid 28% of the time with the engine off, and the DS DS 4 34%. Run the calculator with your own driving.