Cupra Formentor E-Hybrid vs DS DS 4: real-world fuel use
In real life the DS DS 4 uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel than the Cupra Formentor E-Hybrid — about £25 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
9,258 cars in the data
Cupra Formentor E-Hybrid4.3×the official figure
Official
1.2
Real world
5.2
0510 L/100 km
1,431 cars in the data
DS DS 44.0×the official figure
Official
1.3
Real world
5.0
0510 L/100 km
| Cupra Formentor E-Hybrid | DS DS 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| Gap vs official | 4.3× | 4.0× |
| Distance with engine off | 36% | 34% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 119 | 117 |
| Official electric range (km) | 62 | 61 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,681 | 1,728 |
| Cars in the data | 9,258 | 1,431 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the DS DS 4 comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Cupra Formentor E-Hybrid 36% of the time with the engine off, and the DS DS 4 34%. Run the calculator with your own driving.