Peugeot 308 vs Škoda Octavia RS: real-world fuel use
In real life the Peugeot 308 uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel than the Škoda Octavia RS — about £27 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
3,975 cars in the data
Peugeot 3084.8×the official figure
Official
1.1
Real world
5.1
0510 L/100 km
378 cars in the data
Škoda Octavia RS4.4×the official figure
Official
1.2
Real world
5.3
0510 L/100 km
| Peugeot 308 | Škoda Octavia RS | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Gap vs official | 4.8× | 4.4× |
| Distance with engine off | 29% | 23% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 119 | 122 |
| Official electric range (km) | 66 | 66 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,707 | 1,705 |
| Cars in the data | 3,975 | 378 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Peugeot 308 comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Peugeot 308 29% of the time with the engine off, and the Škoda Octavia RS 23%. Run the calculator with your own driving.