Mercedes-Benz E 300 de 4MATIC All-Terrain vs Volkswagen Touareg eHybrid: real-world fuel use
In real life the Mercedes-Benz E 300 de 4MATIC All-Terrain uses 4.9 L/100 km less fuel than the Volkswagen Touareg eHybrid — about £1,035 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
1,081 cars in the data
Mercedes-Benz E 300 de 4MATIC All-Terrain7.2×the official figure
Official
0.6
Real world
4.6
0715 L/100 km
1,953 cars in the data
Volkswagen Touareg eHybrid4.1×the official figure
Official
2.3
Real world
9.5
0715 L/100 km
| Mercedes-Benz E 300 de 4MATIC All-Terrain | Volkswagen Touareg eHybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 4.6 | 9.5 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 0.6 | 2.3 |
| Gap vs official | 7.2× | 4.1× |
| Distance with engine off | 32% | 23% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 121 | 220 |
| Official electric range (km) | 96 | 53 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,387 | 2,432 |
| Cars in the data | 1,081 | 1,953 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Mercedes-Benz E 300 de 4MATIC All-Terrain comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Mercedes-Benz E 300 de 4MATIC All-Terrain 32% of the time with the engine off, and the Volkswagen Touareg eHybrid 23%. Run the calculator with your own driving.