Lexus NX 450h+ vs Volvo V60: real-world fuel use
In real life the Lexus NX 450h+ uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel than the Volvo V60 — about £254 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
2,503 cars in the data
Lexus NX 450h+4.7×the official figure
Official
1.0
Real world
4.8
0510 L/100 km
37,406 cars in the data
Volvo V605.4×the official figure
Official
1.1
Real world
6.0
0510 L/100 km
| Lexus NX 450h+ | Volvo V60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 4.8 | 6.0 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| Gap vs official | 4.7× | 5.4× |
| Distance with engine off | 34% | 27% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 111 | 138 |
| Official electric range (km) | 72 | 77 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,065 | 2,068 |
| Cars in the data | 2,503 | 37,406 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Lexus NX 450h+ comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Lexus NX 450h+ 34% of the time with the engine off, and the Volvo V60 27%. Run the calculator with your own driving.