Land Rover Range Rover vs Mercedes-Benz AMG GLE 53 Hybrid Coupe: real-world fuel use
In real life the Land Rover Range Rover uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel than the Mercedes-Benz AMG GLE 53 Hybrid Coupe — about £231 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
3,393 cars in the data
Land Rover Range Rover8.5×the official figure
Official
1.1
Real world
9.0
0715 L/100 km
582 cars in the data
Mercedes-Benz AMG GLE 53 Hybrid Coupe8.0×the official figure
Official
1.3
Real world
10.1
0715 L/100 km
| Land Rover Range Rover | Mercedes-Benz AMG GLE 53 Hybrid Coupe | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 9.0 | 10.1 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| Gap vs official | 8.5× | 8.0× |
| Distance with engine off | 19% | 25% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 207 | 233 |
| Official electric range (km) | 120 | 86 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,784 | 2,780 |
| Cars in the data | 3,393 | 582 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Land Rover Range Rover comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Land Rover Range Rover 19% of the time with the engine off, and the Mercedes-Benz AMG GLE 53 Hybrid Coupe 25%. Run the calculator with your own driving.