Jeep Grand Cherokee vs Mercedes-Benz GLE 350 e 4MATIC: real-world fuel use
In real life the Mercedes-Benz GLE 350 e 4MATIC uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel than the Jeep Grand Cherokee — about £521 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
481 cars in the data
Jeep Grand Cherokee3.8×the official figure
Official
2.6
Real world
10.1
0715 L/100 km
6,201 cars in the data
Mercedes-Benz GLE 350 e 4MATIC7.1×the official figure
Official
1.1
Real world
7.6
0715 L/100 km
| Jeep Grand Cherokee | Mercedes-Benz GLE 350 e 4MATIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 10.1 | 7.6 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 2.6 | 1.1 |
| Gap vs official | 3.8× | 7.1× |
| Distance with engine off | — | 34% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 232 | 175 |
| Official electric range (km) | 48 | 90 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,576 | 2,605 |
| Cars in the data | 481 | 6,201 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Mercedes-Benz GLE 350 e 4MATIC comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Run the calculator with your own driving.
More comparisons
Audi Q8 55 TFSI e vs Jeep Grand CherokeeAudi Q8 55 TFSI e vs Mercedes-Benz GLE 350 e 4MATICAudi Q8 60 TFSI e vs Mercedes-Benz GLE 350 e 4MATICJeep Grand Cherokee vs Mercedes-Benz GLE 350 de 4MATICJeep Grand Cherokee vs Mercedes-Benz GLE 350 de 4MATIC CoupeJeep Grand Cherokee vs Mercedes-Benz GLE 350 e 4MATIC Coupe