Hyundai Santa Fe vs Mazda CX-60: real-world fuel use
In real life the Hyundai Santa Fe uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel than the Mazda CX-60 — about £340 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
408 cars in the data
Hyundai Santa Fe3.8×the official figure
Official
1.6
Real world
6.1
0510 L/100 km
27,829 cars in the data
Mazda CX-605.4×the official figure
Official
1.4
Real world
7.8
0510 L/100 km
| Hyundai Santa Fe | Mazda CX-60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 6.1 | 7.8 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Gap vs official | 3.8× | 5.4× |
| Distance with engine off | 22% | 29% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 142 | 179 |
| Official electric range (km) | 58 | 63 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,062 | 2,070 |
| Cars in the data | 408 | 27,829 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Hyundai Santa Fe comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Hyundai Santa Fe 22% of the time with the engine off, and the Mazda CX-60 29%. Run the calculator with your own driving.