Honda CR-V vs Suzuki Across: real-world fuel use
In real life the Suzuki Across uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel than the Honda CR-V — about £118 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
354 cars in the data
Honda CR-V6.7×the official figure
Official
0.8
Real world
5.2
0510 L/100 km
476 cars in the data
Suzuki Across4.9×the official figure
Official
0.9
Real world
4.6
0510 L/100 km
| Honda CR-V | Suzuki Across | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| Gap vs official | 6.7× | 4.9× |
| Distance with engine off | 29% | 33% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 120 | 107 |
| Official electric range (km) | 81 | 75 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,988 | 2,015 |
| Cars in the data | 354 | 476 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Suzuki Across comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the Honda CR-V 29% of the time with the engine off, and the Suzuki Across 33%. Run the calculator with your own driving.