BMW 530e xDrive vs Mercedes-Benz C 300 de: real-world fuel use
In real life the Mercedes-Benz C 300 de uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel than the BMW 530e xDrive — about £321 a year at 15,000 km and £1.40/L.
7,725 cars in the data
BMW 530e xDrive3.9×the official figure
Official
1.8
Real world
6.9
0510 L/100 km
6,926 cars in the data
Mercedes-Benz C 300 de5.8×the official figure
Official
0.9
Real world
5.3
0510 L/100 km
| BMW 530e xDrive | Mercedes-Benz C 300 de | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 6.9 | 5.3 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.8 | 0.9 |
| Gap vs official | 3.9× | 5.8× |
| Distance with engine off | 22% | 19% |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 159 | 141 |
| Official electric range (km) | 55 | 78 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 2,036 | 2,046 |
| Cars in the data | 7,725 | 6,926 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the Mercedes-Benz C 300 de comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Owners drive the BMW 530e xDrive 22% of the time with the engine off, and the Mercedes-Benz C 300 de 19%. Run the calculator with your own driving.