BMW 320e vs DS DS 7 (Crossback): real-world fuel use
In real life both use about the same fuel: 6.2 L/100 km.
8,426 cars in the data
BMW 320e4.3×the official figure
Official
1.4
Real world
6.2
0510 L/100 km
3,522 cars in the data
DS DS 7 (Crossback)4.5×the official figure
Official
1.4
Real world
6.2
0510 L/100 km
| BMW 320e | DS DS 7 (Crossback) | |
|---|---|---|
| Real fuel use (L/100 km) | 6.2 | 6.2 |
| Official fuel use (L/100 km) | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Gap vs official | 4.3× | 4.5× |
| Distance with engine off | 23% | — |
| Real CO2 from fuel (g/km) | 143 | 144 |
| Official electric range (km) | 59 | 62 |
| Average kerb weight (kg) | 1,883 | 1,872 |
| Cars in the data | 8,426 | 3,522 |
Bold = better. Source: EEA OBFCM real-world data, reporting year 2024, CC BY 4.0.
Which one is cheaper to run?
On fuel alone, the BMW 320e comes out ahead for the average owner. Your own result depends mostly on how often you charge. Run the calculator with your own driving.